For nearly three years, it has seemed inevitable that the Supreme Court would strike down the “buffer zones” that restrict ...
Justices Thomas and Alito dissented from the court’s refusal to reconsider a 25-year-old precedent upholding “buffer zones” ...
The Associated Press on MSN12d
Supreme Court turns back challenges to laws keeping abortion opponents away from clinics, patientsSamuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, disagreed. The cities said the laws were passed to address disturbing behavior from ...
CBS News on MSN12d
Supreme Court turns away bid to overturn 25-year-old decision on abortion clinic buffer zonesThe Supreme Court turned away two appeals asking the justices to overrule a 25-year-old decision that allowed for buffer ...
Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented, saying that the precedent deserved a fresh look since the court ...
Abortion opponents wanted the Supreme Court to scrap protest restrictions around clinics. Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito ...
The US Supreme Court dealt a setback to abortion opponents, refusing to reconsider a 2000 decision that lets states and ...
N.J., that ban anti-abortion activists from approaching someone entering an abortion clinic, sometimes dubbed “sidewalk ...
The Supreme Court refused Monday to take up a First Amendment case to revisit a previous ruling enshrining abortion clinic ...
12don MSN
The Supreme Court declined to consider overturning a 24-year-old precedent that upheld "buffer zone" laws limiting how close ...
The majority did not explain their reasoning for turning down the appeals, as is typical, but two conservative justices, Samuel Alito and Clarence ... But anti-abortion activists said the measures ...
Results that may be inaccessible to you are currently showing.
Hide inaccessible results