For nearly three years, it has seemed inevitable that the Supreme Court would strike down the “buffer zones” that restrict ...
Justices Thomas and Alito dissented from the court’s refusal to reconsider a 25-year-old precedent upholding “buffer zones” ...
N.J., that ban anti-abortion activists from approaching someone entering an abortion clinic, sometimes dubbed “sidewalk ...
10don MSN
The Supreme Court has declined to hear cases from abortion opponents who say limiting demonstrations near clinics violate ...
Abortion opponents wanted the Supreme Court to scrap protest restrictions around clinics. Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito ...
Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented, saying that the precedent deserved a fresh look since the court ...
The US Supreme Court dealt a setback to abortion opponents, refusing to reconsider a 2000 decision that lets states and ...
At issue was a 25-year precedent that allows local governments to create protest-free buffer zones around all health-care ...
The Supreme Court refused Monday to take up a First Amendment case to revisit a previous ruling enshrining abortion clinic ...
“Hill was wrong the day it was decided, and the case for overruling it has only strengthened ever since,” Paul Clement, a ...
WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court refused Monday to hear a pair of cases from abortion opponents who ... but two conservative justices, Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, disagreed.
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results