For nearly three years, it has seemed inevitable that the Supreme Court would strike down the “buffer zones” that restrict protests near the entrances of reproductive health clinics. A majority of the court has already castigated these laws—and past precedent upholding them—as a subversion of anti-abortion protesters’ First Amendment rights.
The Court refuses a case on ‘sidewalk counseling,’ over a vigorous dissent.
13dOpinion
Axios on MSNJustice Thomas urges Supreme Court to reconsider free speech rules near abortion clinicsJustice Clarence Thomas issued a scathing dissent Monday after the Supreme Court declined to hear a case challenging free speech rights around abortion clinics, suggesting he wants to revisit the matter after the court ended the federal constitutional right to abortion in 2022.
Conservative Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas said he would “explicitly overturn” 25-year-old precedent that legalizes protest-free buffer zones outside abortion clinics to prevent anti ...
Justice Clarence Thomas issued a forceful dissent on Monday after the Supreme Court declined to hear a case challenging First Amendment restrictions for protesters outside abortion clinics. Thomas, an appointee of former President George H.
CBS News on MSN13d
Supreme Court turns away bid to overturn 25-year-old decision on abortion clinic buffer zonesThe Supreme Court turned away two appeals asking the justices to overrule a 25-year-old decision that allowed for buffer zones around abortion clinics.
The Associated Press on MSN13d
Supreme Court turns back challenges to laws keeping abortion opponents away from clinics, patientsThe Supreme Court has declined to hear a pair of cases from abortion opponents who say laws limiting anti-abortion demonstrations near clinics violate their First Amendment rights.
12d
The Christian Post on MSNSupreme Court declines to hear challenge to abortion 'bubble zone' law as city quietly repeals itThe United States Supreme Court has declined to hear a case that could have led to the reversal of a decades-old decision upholding bubble zones outside abortion clinics as the city at the center of
Abortion opponents wanted the Supreme Court to scrap protest restrictions around clinics. Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito said they would have taken the case.
The US Supreme Court dealt a setback to abortion opponents, refusing to reconsider a 2000 decision that lets states and cities create protective zones to shield patients from being approached near clinic entrances.
The U.S. Supreme Court declined Monday to hear a pro-life challenge against protest restrictions around abortion clinics in Illinois ... a decision met with a fiery dissent by Justice Clarence Thomas. The court rejected appeals from Coalition Life ...
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas stands onstage after addressing the Federalist Society’s National Lawyers Convention dinner at National Harbor, in Oxon Hill, Maryland, on Thursday ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results