Systematic reviews are fundamental to the appraisal and synthesis of evidence in health and social care. They utilise pre‐defined protocols to gather, evaluate and integrate findings from diverse ...

A new publication in Nature Reviews Methods Primers provides essential guidance for conducting rigorous systematic reviews on studies with animals and cells. It also highlights the benefits of these ...

Mental health misinformation is rising across social media. Learn how it varies and why action is urgently needed.

Despite rapid advances in large language models, this study shows that human expertise remains critical for producing rigorous systematic reviews, with AI best suited as a supervised support tool ...

An ad hoc committee of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine will evaluate the current standards for high-quality systematic reviews for comparative effectiveness research and ...

Introduction With the acceleration of the global ageing trend, sarcopenia has become a major public health problem. Probable sarcopenia, characterised primarily by decreased muscle strength, ...

Introduction Neonatal survival continues to pose a global health challenge. Skin-to-skin contact (SSC) has been shown to ...

Incidence of pneumonitis in Asian patients with small cell lung cancer: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

A systematic review pooling data from 23 randomized controlled trials and 1,474 participants has found that collagen ...