Now, in a five-page letter sent by Jay Clayton, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, to U.S. District Judge ...

There was no proof the DOJ redacted the document after posting it. In fact, there was a copy of it on the DOJ website that ...

The ease of recovering information that was not properly redacted digitally suggests that at least some of the documents ...

Epstein files after publishing thousands of files over the weekend that included many redactions—with some pages entirely ...

Late Friday afternoon, the Justice Department began releasing thousands of pages of files and communications related to Jeffrey Epstein. The new documents include photos, call logs, court filings and ...

The release comes amid intense scrutiny from congressional lawmakers and victims over the DOJ's handling of the Epstein files ...

“Anyone can read the redactions of the Epstein Files by just copying and pasting them into a word doc. The people at Trump’s ...

Redact” once meant to edit. But around the middle of the 20th century, it began to refer to one particular kind of editing.

Newly released Department of Justice Epstein files are drawing intense criticism for heavy redactions and the temporary removal of documents mentioning President Trump.

CBS News found that more than 550 pages of newly released Jeffrey Epstein records from the U.S. Department of Justice are entirely blacked out, sparking bipartisan criticism over transparency despite ...

The US Justice Department has released thousands of heavily redacted documents related to the late financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, which made scant reference to US President ...

The Friday document dump was long anticipated for its potential new details about the late sex offender and his connections to powerful people but criticized for redactions and being incomplete.